Skip to main content

Presentation to Extraordinary General Meeting, Thursday 10th November 2020, Rydalmere

SU NSW Treasurer, speaker notes

Presentation to Extraordinary General Meeting, Thursday 10th November 2020, Rydalmere

 

Purpose of EGM: To share with members the prime reasons for why the SU NSW Board unanimously decided to not merge with other States and Territories in formation of SUA.

Brief from chair: Two Powerpoint slides, ten-minute maximum

My contribution: Stewardship

Other speakers: Legal (10 minutes), Strategic (10 minutes)

Interpretation of brief: Focus on two prime stewardship aspects that led to decision to not participate in merger.

 

Slide 1: highest level financial concern

 


 Speak to:

 - An unresolved matter as to COVID19 funding which potentially overstates the FY21 surplus by approximately $3.8M. SU NSW could not analytically support the value of Jobkeeper receipts and no response to an expressed concern was forthcoming from National.

- Such that the accumulated 4 year surplus amounts to breakeven – an uncomfortable result given all the uncertainities.

- That SU NSW queried FY25 with the aim of including it for members particularly as Chaplaincy is not subject any current Commonwealth Government advance estimates at this time.

- That further: financial reserves are earmarked for purpose such that the combined balance sheet need be read carefully as to a distinction between those reserves that are dedicated to a particular purpose and those that are not. The SUA Board had committed to ensuring that monies were used for purpose. As such there was a question as to the success of the amalgamation as to the availability of free float monies to fund national initiatives.

 

Slide 2: The risk matrix

 Speak to:

- In introducing the matrix: speak to how it is traffic light coded such that red shaded risks need to be approached with great caution.

- how some risks were rated as almost certain and were to be subject discussion after SU NSW committed to the Transformation Agreement.

- how SU NSW advocated for dialogue as to risk and received the response that such dialogue would only arise once the Transformation Agreement was signed.

- how working parties have formed to discuss a variety of matters including the risks.

- how the SU NSW Board was ultimately of the view that dialogue on risk had not been sound nor timely.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

COVID-19 NFP Government financial support

Prepared for SU entities throughout Australia (a covering email draws attention to three fantastic resources) ---------------------------- [Email from PWC 27 March 2020] COVID-19 and Not for Profits: Short and long term resilience     Dear David Thank you for registering your interest in yesterday's virtual event.   We know a few people had some trouble connecting and if you were one of those people, we apologise for the inconvenience. We did have to change the online platform at late notice to a more robust system in order to support the unprecedented response we received.    The good news is that the session was recorded and a viewing link will be shared with you early next week [ I will post link here once the viewing link is available ].    As promised, each of our speakers have prepared materials to share with you:   Crisis management and virtual engagement and communications   Cassandra Mich...

SU NSW volunteering activities March 2020

It is pleasing to be acknowledged for some current volunteer activities: - National Redress Scheme, and, - National Scripture Union Transformation process.