Monday night’s Four Corners program on ABC TV was
of great interest. The program was titled: “The
financial scandal and human cost of Australia's failing workers compensation
schemes”. It went to air with the title: “Unethical & Immoral”. The program
considered alleged failings of Victoria and NSW’s workers compensation schemes.
The schemes are run by government owned entities; Workcover in Victoria and iCare in NSW. Together the schemes
provide workers compensation to a large proportion of Australia’s workforce.
The television program was of interest in that a
risk professional likes to consider whether red flags were evident in governance
or business practice prior to the emergence of the impact of misconduct. Now, I’m
not suggesting there is misconduct – only that the investigative journalism of
the ABC allows an insight into the current affairs. That is, I’m taking the ABC
journalism as the whole of the account. Indeed, I’ve kept analysis here strictly
to the transcript of the program. Red flags are indicators that something is
wrong, or that something terrible will emerge. So, for Enron, the complex financial
instruments and the plethora of off-balance sheet special purpose vehicles were
both red flags.
To a risk professional the consideration of red
flags sharpens skill. Study of red flags in poor weather best prepares you to recognise
emergent red flags on entering poor weather. In turn, such skill allows for mitigation activity to be implemented.
As the program content was roughly 80/20 split iCare/Workcover
I’ll keep analysis to iCare only.
“The scheme is heading for a financial disaster, and it was heading for a financial disaster before the COVID pandemic hit.”
Daniel
Mookhey, NSW Shadow Minister for Finance and Small Business
So, what were the iCare red flags as presented by
Four Corners? I’ve listed the red flags here. All of them drawn from the program transcript:
- Claimant dissatisfaction; slow processing, lack of
response,
- Claimants pushed to despair and depression on
observing poor or untimely decision-making,
- Denial of claimant treating doctor medical advice
with emphasis on iCare scheme agent medical expert advice,
- Financial incentive driven decision-making at claim
level and business process level,
- Street talk within the insurance industry is
circumspect of inadequate or thin executive recruitment practices,
- Thin accountability of iCare with lack of transparency
compared to other government agencies,
- Rapid growth of wage account without any measurable
productive returns,
- Poor improvement in a key ratio; worker return to
work rates,
- Significant financial losses with no immediate horizon
to return to surplus,
- Conflict of interest,
- Early warnings from NSW Treasury.
Comments
Post a Comment